-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
[JOSS Review] Tests #185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Dear @mbarzegary - see comments below:
FEniCS is not testes via pytest because of the complicated installation procedure. However, we now added a test to github actions that essentially runs the FEniCS examples that are provided for testing (@jotelha).
Some tests were skipped ('s'), likely because Note that some changes are in PR #208 and not yet in master. |
Fenics installation is indeed not of negligible effort, in particular since the fenics integration only plays a role in one of several sub-modules. I have added a test on fenics integration with #213. The test is skipped if fenics is not available. |
Dear authors,
The software has standard and comprehensive automated tests implemented using pytest. However, these minor points can be taken into account in this regard:
P.S. This issue is related to openjournals/joss-reviews#5668
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: