Skip to content

better error handling for professional flows #11314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
4 of 5 tasks
lucaseatp opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11458
Closed
4 of 5 tasks

better error handling for professional flows #11314

lucaseatp opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11458
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lucaseatp
Copy link

lucaseatp commented Dec 3, 2024

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

dify is a great tool, but it lacks one crucial thing for production: better error handling.

Straightforward things make a huge difference, like, when anthropic gives you a 529 error (overloaded), wait 15 seconds and try again, maybe you can do it 3 or 5 times.

if it doesn't work, we should have the option to choose another AI model to handle this data.

really simple things, but they make a huge difference to avoid errors in production flows.

and that's just for llm nodes... error handling should be a feature anytime soon

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
@lucaseatp lucaseatp changed the title better error handling for professional tools better error handling for professional flows Dec 3, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the 💪 enhancement New feature or request label Dec 3, 2024
@acauaferreira
Copy link

yes, very important!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants