Skip to content

Enable CSIVolumeGroupSnapshot feature gate by default #1223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
xing-yang opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Enable CSIVolumeGroupSnapshot feature gate by default #1223

xing-yang opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem?/Why is this needed

Describe the solution you'd like in detail

We moved volume group snapshot to beta while disabled the CSIVolumeGroupSnapshot feature gate by default:
#1194

We can enable it by default in the next release.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@pwschuurman
Copy link
Contributor

We can enable it by default in the next release.

Just to confirm, would this be the v9.0.0 release?

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We are moving this feature to beta while keeping the feature gate disabled by default in the coming release which should be v9.0.0.
So maybe we can make it enabled by default in 9.1.0. (This is TBD)

@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed this in the CSI implementation meeting. We'll cut a 8.2.0 soon (moving to beta while keeping the feature gate disabled by default). Since it is off by default, we don't need to bump the major version. There are RBAC rule changes but those are also not required yet.

When we turn the feature on by default, we'll bump the major version to 9.0.

@yati1998
Copy link
Contributor

yati1998 commented Jan 2, 2025

@xing-yang the PR for this issue will be created on top of release branch or main?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 2, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants