You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I got this message while running the test suite recently:
The java-17-openjdk package is deprecated and may no longer receive updates. Since f42 install adoptium-temurin-java-repository and install temurin-17-jre
We could install Eclipse Temurin rather than getting Java from the distribution. The precise manner in which this would be implemented would vary by distribution. That would be a change from how we do things today, where we install Java from the distribution.
Alternatively, we could stop trying to install an older Java LTS and install the latest Java LTS supported by each distribution. That might vary by distribution as well (e.g., newer distribution releases might carry newer Java LTS releases). That would also be a change from today, where we try to install Java 17 across all distributions (except for Fedora 41, where only Java 21 is available).
I have no strong preference as to which choice is made. To the implementer goes the decision. Whoever is doing the work can choose the implementation that makes the most sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fedora is phasing out their old Java 17 package (java-17-openjdk) and recommending we switch to Eclipse Temurin instead. It's like when your favorite coffee shop stops selling your usual blend and points you to a better supplier.
The solution for this is
Switch to Eclipse Temurin:
I got this message while running the test suite recently:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThirdPartyLegacyJdks#adoptium-temurin-java-repository
We could install Eclipse Temurin rather than getting Java from the distribution. The precise manner in which this would be implemented would vary by distribution. That would be a change from how we do things today, where we install Java from the distribution.
Alternatively, we could stop trying to install an older Java LTS and install the latest Java LTS supported by each distribution. That might vary by distribution as well (e.g., newer distribution releases might carry newer Java LTS releases). That would also be a change from today, where we try to install Java 17 across all distributions (except for Fedora 41, where only Java 21 is available).
I have no strong preference as to which choice is made. To the implementer goes the decision. Whoever is doing the work can choose the implementation that makes the most sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: