You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Use TreeCursor to pretty-print :tree-sitter-subtree
The current `:tree-sitter-subtree` has a bug for field-names when the
field name belongs to an unnamed child node. Take this ruby example:
def self.method_name
true
end
The subtree given by tree-sitter-cli is:
(singleton_method [2, 0] - [4, 3]
object: (self [2, 4] - [2, 8])
name: (identifier [2, 9] - [2, 20])
body: (body_statement [3, 2] - [3, 6]
(true [3, 2] - [3, 6])))
But the `:tree-sitter-subtree` output was
(singleton_method
object: (self)
body: (identifier)
(body_statement (true)))
The `singleton_method` rule defines the `name` and `body` fields in an
unnamed helper rule `_method_rest` and the old implementation of
`pretty_print_tree_impl` would pass the `field_name` down from the
named `singleton_method` node.
To fix it we switch to the [TreeCursor] API which is recommended by
the tree-sitter docs for traversing the tree. `TreeCursor::field_name`
accurately determines the field name for the current cursor position
even when the node is unnamed.
[TreeCursor]: https://docs.rs/tree-sitter/0.20.9/tree_sitter/struct.TreeCursor.html
0 commit comments