You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This commit moves the parsing, compiling and enforcement
of the `redirect=` and `redirect-rule=` network filter
options into the static network filtering engine as
modifier options -- just like `csp=` and `queryprune=`.
This solves the two following issues:
- #3590
- uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#1008 (comment)
Additionally, `redirect=` option is not longer afflicted
by static network filtering syntax quirks, `redirect=`
filters can be used with any other static filtering
modifier options, can be excepted using `@@` and can be
badfilter-ed.
Since more than one `redirect=` directives could be found
to apply to a single network request, the concept of
redirect priority is introduced.
By default, `redirect=` directives have an implicit
priority of 0. Filter authors can declare an explicit
priority by appending `:[integer]` to the token of the
`redirect=` option, for example:
||example.com/*.js$1p,script,redirect=noopjs:100
The priority dictates which redirect token out of many
will be ultimately used. Cases of multiple `redirect=`
directives applying to a single blocked network request
are expected to be rather unlikely.
Explicit redirect priority should be used if and only if
there is a case of redirect ambiguity to solve.
0 commit comments