Skip to content

Releasing the modules #1471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
10 tasks done
stephenplusplus opened this issue Aug 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
10 tasks done

Releasing the modules #1471

stephenplusplus opened this issue Aug 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor

stephenplusplus commented Aug 7, 2016

Our repo has been split up into ready-to-publish modules. This issue will track what needs to be done before we can get the next release out.

  • Make a module-friendly docs site: PR
  • Modify our JSDocs -> JSON build process to suit the changes from the docs site PR
    • Combine @classdesc docs with @description docs
    • Write package specific Getting Started docs in @description tag
    • Automate toc.json creation
    • Move configuration object documentation to a Getting Started markdown file
    • Update all links to configuration objects
  • Publish all @google-cloud/service modules to npm at 0.1.0
  • Publish the umbrella package, google-cloud, at 0.38.0
  • Revert README change
@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@callmehiphop please update the post if I got any of those steps wrong / left anything out.

@nvartolomei
Copy link

nvartolomei commented Aug 8, 2016

Publish the umbrella package, google-cloud

next time, please, update readme at the same time you publish new npm package or change the active branch on github so people do not read broken readme/doc or add notices like kubernetes repo does.

@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep, we should have left a message for users directing them to the accurate docs here: https://googlecloudplatform.github.io/gcloud-node/#/docs/v0.37.0/gcloud. I'll do that now, sorry for the confusion.

@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor Author

We're published!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants