-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Normalize short description and short examples #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@glory please check the short descriptions and examples for consistency. |
To ensure consistency, which pattern should be adopt for short descriptions and examples to be used across all relations? Between which should be used; Short Description : "a word that is more general than a given word" Short Example : |
I think maybe this issue is superseded by #39. Shall we close this one? |
Closing as the discussion has moved to #39. |
It looks like Francis meant to close this. I'll close it now. |
Because we want the short definitions and examples to be useful for quick reference (e.g., on tooltips), we should ensure that the short definition is a single short sentence or phrase, not multiple sentences, and the example gives a single easy-to-understand example of the relation.
We should also normalize the way we talk about things, e.g., for
hypernym
we say "a word that is more general than a given word" but formeronym
we say "Y makes up a part of X". We should be consistent in the way they are described.Similarly for examples, for
hypernym
we have "animal is a hypernym of dog" but formeronym
we have "hand/finger".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: