Persistency CFT [2025-05-08, 2:30 - 4:00 pm] #1014
guysagnes
started this conversation in
Persistency FT
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Architecture / DesignFollowing the feedback from https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/472?sort=new 28.04.2025 Proposition about persisted data in file system |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Current process state: 20250508 Qorix Sprint Review KVS.pdf |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Agenda
Participants:
@guysagnes
@sbachmann-qorix
@joshualicht
@hbragge
@JannikSzwajczyk
@umaucher
@arsibo
Open Pull request
kvs: adapted review points in library and tests by sbachmann-qorix · Pull Request #7 · eclipse-score/inc_mw_per
→ Review pending (Has Default check) Persistency CFT [2025-04-24, 2:30 - 4:00 pm] · eclipse-score · Discussion #958
→ Rebased requested
kvs_cpp: Initial cpp interface by vbogdanb · Pull Request #8 · eclipse-score/inc_mw_per
→ Rework requested
→ Reorganization Source
→ dependency to BMW Result class -
→ Adaptation of implementation
constructor vs. open
Merged content
Closed pull request
This implementation will not be continued and the related pull request will be closed
Architecture / Design
Following the feedback from https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/472?sort=new 28.04.2025
The persistence CFT shall provide a design proposition how to handle the position of the persisted data in file system
Open actions
Both approach are expected based on code and external definition. see -> https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/pull/1027/files#diff-3eb32dedc0c7db93acd3182b3a6d176276b791d42404123362d7616225ca713cR56
Meeting Minutes
Related Persistency CFT Board:
Persistency FT
Feature Request for Persistency · Issue #95 · eclipse-score/score
Pull request are open
persistency: Feature request for KVS by LittleHuba · Pull Request #219 · eclipse-score/score
persistency: Feature request for File Access by LittleHuba · Pull Request #220 · eclipse-score/score
New pull requests:
https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/pull/1027/files
Proposition to check the content from previous commit related to the KVS Feature
address scope of file system persistence priority due to missing statement for assumption of use spec. QNX inside Lead Community @guysagnes
Alignment of the board in relation to report https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/853
Next Steps
refer to the board
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions