Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Error in "post_fp_cp2k" link, ask for help. #1346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
bizhisheng opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 11 comments
Closed

Error in "post_fp_cp2k" link, ask for help. #1346

bizhisheng opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 11 comments

Comments

@bizhisheng
Copy link

Hello, everybody!

I recently encountered a problem during the operation of DPGEN, and I still can't solve it. So let's ask the professionals.

In the process of running the CH4 case given by DPGEN official website, it is very smooth. When I changed the system to TiO2, the following error appeared in the "post_fp_cp2k" link. (nohup.out file)

The difference between CH4 and TiO2 cases is that TiO2 takes 2000K temperature.

Thank you for reading, and look forward to having experts provide valuable suggestions and opinions!
nohup.txt

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Oct 16, 2023

@robinzyb Could you take a look?

@robinzyb
Copy link
Collaborator

I found the dpdata didn't find cell in your dpgen output. this is most probably caused by empty appending. you can try to write a loop by yourself using dpdata to read cp2k data in 02.fp files to find out the output with problem.

@12jscvb
Copy link

12jscvb commented Oct 29, 2023

Hello, I have the same problem as you. Have you solved your problem?

@bizhisheng
Copy link
Author

@robinzyb Could you take a look?

Professor Zhuang
Hello, you mean to let me use the "cp2kdata" toolkit, right? Excuse me, how can I embed cp2kdata into dpgen?

@robinzyb
Copy link
Collaborator

I didn't mean that. I am not sure if some calculation in fp.02 haven't done or read properly. Could you upload the whole fp.02?

@bizhisheng
Copy link
Author

I didn't mean that. I am not sure if some calculation in fp.02 haven't done or read properly. Could you upload the whole fp.02?

Professor zhuang
Hello, this is 02.fp related documents for your reference.
02.fp.zip

@robinzyb
Copy link
Collaborator

because none of your cp2k calculation is converged.

tsf-500-wpa-7-033:robinzhuang(02.fp)$ grep NOT task.000.00000*/output*
task.000.000000/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000001/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000002/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000003/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000004/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000005/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000006/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000007/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000008/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***
task.000.000009/output: *** WARNING in qs_scf.F:542 :: SCF run NOT converged ***

I will add error message for this, later.

@robinzyb
Copy link
Collaborator

This problem should be fixed #1245, which is now in the devel branch. But it hasn't merged to main/master branch. To avoid the problem, try install DP-GEN In devel branch. @bizhisheng

@robinzyb
Copy link
Collaborator

One more, it is abnormal that all cp2k jobs are failed. check the setups

@bizhisheng
Copy link
Author

Professor Zhuang
Thank you for checking. Your suggestion is very important to me, and I will carefully check the related mistakes. I wish you success in your work and good health!

@bizhisheng
Copy link
Author

Hello, I have the same problem as you. Have you solved your problem?

Hello, I haven't solved the related problem for the time being, but you can read the comments in the follow-up. Maybe it will help you.

@deepmodeling deepmodeling locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2023
@njzjz njzjz converted this issue into discussion #1380 Nov 2, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants