You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As the title say, there is a problem with the $redirect-rules acting as simple $redirect when paired with the $important filter.
example: *$script,redirect-rule=noopjs,domain=brave.com,important every script will get the noopjs, just like if you used the simple $redirect filter.
If you remove the $important from the filter, then only matomo.js gets the noopjs.
It works fine in uBlock and while it is not something critical or something everyone will use, it is still a misbehavior by Brave's adblocker not to respect the $redirect-rule filter and how it only should apply redirection to blocked elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The easy fix for this (duplicating all important filters without redirect-rule) would have a significant increase in memory consumption so I'll probably revisit this after some further optimizations.
As the title say, there is a problem with the $redirect-rules acting as simple $redirect when paired with the $important filter.
example:
*$script,redirect-rule=noopjs,domain=brave.com,important
every script will get the noopjs, just like if you used the simple $redirect filter.If you remove the $important from the filter, then only matomo.js gets the noopjs.
It works fine in uBlock and while it is not something critical or something everyone will use, it is still a misbehavior by Brave's adblocker not to respect the $redirect-rule filter and how it only should apply redirection to blocked elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: