-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
How to skip photos already uploaded? #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Seems like it only re-uploaded the first album for some reason. On the other albums then it says, e.g.:
So it seems like the script will skip complete albums but if a 1,000 photo album is missing a single photo then it will re-upload the album... |
Also, after restarting the script then only after ~ 100 photos or so then the same 429 error popped up again:
Even though I'm still within quota: |
Update: In the end I abandoned this tool due to the HTTP 429 errors. The only alternative I found is to use Google's Backup and Sync program which uploaded all ~ 20,000 photos over night via a 650 Mbps internet connection. Only downside is that it doesn't understand albums but all the pictures are searchable using keywords, e.g. 'watch' or 'toilet' etc. |
Update: The Google Photos search mechanism works really well... but only for me. If I share the photos -- with e.g. my wife -- then she just sees a scrollable list of ~ 20,000 photos and no way to search them. This is frustrating and makes me wonder if Google Photos is the right way to go... |
https://github.com/angrycandy/flickr-to-google-photos fixes a lot of the problems you encountered. But it is slower than Backup and Sync because of the 10000 requests per day quota. |
Unfortunately the upload failed for me after about 1,100 photos:
The Google photo API also seemed to be within limit:
Another help page says:
I tried restarting the script but it then starts uploading the same photos AGAIN which is uploaded before, thus eating further into my limit :-(
How to ask the script to not re-upload previously uploaded photos?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: