Skip to content

feat(airbyte-ci): supports data activation flag in metadata service #59746

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

maxi297
Copy link
Contributor

@maxi297 maxi297 commented May 9, 2025

What

We're adding a new field to a connector's metadata for data activation. The field is already supported by the platform, and there's a destination connector (destination-cobra) that is using it in a merged PR which we will retrigger after we merge this

How

Add the field to the models and update the dependencies.

Review guide

User Impact

This should enable the flag to be populated in the platform

Can this PR be safely reverted and rolled back?

  • YES 💚
  • NO ❌

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
airbyte-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 9, 2025 2:33pm

@maxi297 maxi297 changed the title supports data activation flag in metadata service feat: supports data activation flag in metadata service May 9, 2025
@maxi297 maxi297 marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 14:49
@maxi297 maxi297 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2025 14:49
@maxi297 maxi297 changed the title feat: supports data activation flag in metadata service feat(airbyte-ci): supports data activation flag in metadata service May 9, 2025
@maxi297 maxi297 merged commit d45fb25 into master May 9, 2025
33 checks passed
@maxi297 maxi297 deleted the maxi297/supports-data-activation-flag-in-ci branch May 9, 2025 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants