-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
[cdks, source-postgres, source-mysql, source-mongodb-v2] Fixing vulnerabilities in dependencies #58132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
/bump-version type=patch changelog="Fix vulnerabilities in dependencies."
|
Can we also include airbyte-source-mongodb-v2 here? It's a key priority for Optum |
Sure, I see MongoDB is flagged for mina-core from grype. I will include that as well. |
/publish-java-cdk dry-run=false
|
@wennergr now MongoDB has been included to receive the fix. |
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ dependencies { | |||
api 'org.slf4j:slf4j-api:2.0.16' | |||
api 'io.github.oshai:kotlin-logging-jvm:7.0.0' | |||
api 'org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core:1.8.1' | |||
|
|||
api 'net.minidev:json-smart:2.5.2' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why adding this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is to override the json smart library's version. json smart is another vulnerability and has been fixed in this version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The vulnerable version is in base image?
…abilities in dependencies (airbytehq#58132) Co-authored-by: Octavia Squidington III <[email protected]>
What
Fixes https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte-internal-issues/issues/12439
How
Review guide
User Impact
Can this PR be safely reverted and rolled back?