You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
It would also be interesting to specify target tetrahedra resolutions on a per material basis. For example, setting material 1 to always be at the finest resolution, while allowed material 2 to use larger tets.
Again, this is a matter of octree construction, but it would have to be carefully informed as to which materials are in which cells wrt different targets. The cmdline interface would also be a bit tricky to implement (you'd have to specify values per material). But, it could be a useful feature if users know they need resolution for different materials but can sacrifice it for others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Cardiac propagation models would benefit from this feature. Typically heart cells need to be very small and torso cells (which act only as volume conductors) can be larger.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
It would also be interesting to specify target tetrahedra resolutions on a per material basis. For example, setting material 1 to always be at the finest resolution, while allowed material 2 to use larger tets.
Again, this is a matter of octree construction, but it would have to be carefully informed as to which materials are in which cells wrt different targets. The cmdline interface would also be a bit tricky to implement (you'd have to specify values per material). But, it could be a useful feature if users know they need resolution for different materials but can sacrifice it for others.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: