-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Use snowflakes #8
Comments
https://github.com/bwmarrin/snowflake seems like an extremely good candidate. |
This would still be nice to have. We potentially could eradicate meaningful message IDs. A migration plan should be made. |
Thats not even what it was suggested for |
What kind of sorcery is this? |
What a great way to revive an issue that was made 2 years ago. 🙄 |
By the way, snowflakes suck. Although we don't use it, each piece of mail has 2 UUIDs to associate the mail with, so we don't really need snowflakes. |
Primarily, snowflakes (if used) would coincide best with #5 and #6, in which the mail system formulates mail to be delivered, stripping most user-provided content that could be abused (i.e. various headers). Obviously this was never implemented, but it may be worth keeping it open or mentioning within #5 as a design hint in case such ever happens. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
It's been discussed to use snowflakes.

Observe the following:
If we used a snowflake, we could strike
mail_id
andtimestamp
out with oneINT(18)
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: