Replies: 2 comments
-
@Krastanov, please let me know that whether these outputs showing expected behaviour (2nd shaded block) of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hm, I think it's possible this might not make sense. It's an experimental work from a while back when I was trying some stuff. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, Stefan!
I would like to ask you a question about
conjugate destabs.
Please let me know if this is plausible: so we haveapply!
forCliffordOperator
, but it's only conjugating the.stab
parts and nothing is happening to thedestabs
. You have commented # TODO conjugate also the destabs . In light of this, I think a function should be callled insideapply!
after this line(apply!(state.stab, gate))
, so that we can conjugate destabs.Currently, without conjugate destabs, we have the following output:
Please let me know that after implementing
conjugate destabs,
are these plausible? I hope this is not so bad.Thank you for your time.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions