fix: cp-12.18.0 Update reject data on rejectAllApprovals utility (#32466)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

This PR fixes the unintentionally removed rejection data `cause`
property back into `rejectAllApprovals` utility.

[![Open in GitHub
Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/32466?quickstart=1)

## **Related issues**

Fixes: #32162

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to test-dapp
2. Trigger 3 transaction request back to back
3. Use reject all in the last one
4. Be able to trigger another transaction after "rejecting all"

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [X] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask
Extension Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [X] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [X] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [X] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [X] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

Author: OGPoyraz

app/scripts/lib/approval/utils.test.ts

@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ import { rejectAllApprovals, rejectOriginApprovals } from './utils';
 const ID_MOCK = '123';
 const ID_MOCK_2 = '456';
 const INTERFACE_ID_MOCK = '789';
+const REJECT_ALL_APPROVALS_DATA = {
+  data: {
+    cause: 'rejectAllApprovals',
+  },
+};
 
 function createApprovalControllerMock(
   pendingApprovals: Partial<ApprovalRequest<Record<string, Json>>>[],
@@ -40,11 +45,11 @@ describe('Approval Utils', () => {
       expect(approvalController.reject).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
       expect(approvalController.reject).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
         ID_MOCK,
-        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(),
+        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(REJECT_ALL_APPROVALS_DATA),
       );
       expect(approvalController.reject).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
         ID_MOCK_2,
-        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(),
+        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(REJECT_ALL_APPROVALS_DATA),
       );
     });
 
@@ -122,7 +127,7 @@ describe('Approval Utils', () => {
       expect(approvalController.reject).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
       expect(approvalController.reject).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
         ID_MOCK,
-        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(),
+        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest(REJECT_ALL_APPROVALS_DATA),
       );
     });
   });

app/scripts/lib/approval/utils.ts

@@ -94,7 +94,14 @@ function rejectApproval({
 
     default:
       log('Rejecting pending approval', { id, origin, type });
-      approvalController.reject(id, providerErrors.userRejectedRequest());
+      approvalController.reject(
+        id,
+        providerErrors.userRejectedRequest({
+          data: {
+            cause: 'rejectAllApprovals',
+          },
+        }),
+      );
       break;
   }
 }