You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In quantms (see issue #532), we've encountered a challenge: if we don't explicitly filter by fragmentation mode (e.g., HCD or CID), we end up with TMT3 identifications based on MS3 spectra, which is not ideal. To address this, we considered passing the fragmentation mode (CID, HCD, etc.) directly to MS-GF+. However, many of the datasets we analyze contain thousands of files with mixed fragmentation modes, making it difficult to annotate everything correctly.
Interestingly, both Comet and SAGE offer the ability to filter spectra for identification based on MS level (e.g., MS2 only). This is quite helpful, as it selects the correct spectra regardless of fragmentation mode and also resolves the issue with TMT3 identifications.
Would you be open to adding support for filtering by MS level in MS-GF+?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @alchemistmatt @FarmGeek4Life,
In quantms (see issue #532), we've encountered a challenge: if we don't explicitly filter by fragmentation mode (e.g., HCD or CID), we end up with TMT3 identifications based on MS3 spectra, which is not ideal. To address this, we considered passing the fragmentation mode (CID, HCD, etc.) directly to MS-GF+. However, many of the datasets we analyze contain thousands of files with mixed fragmentation modes, making it difficult to annotate everything correctly.
Interestingly, both Comet and SAGE offer the ability to filter spectra for identification based on MS level (e.g., MS2 only). This is quite helpful, as it selects the correct spectra regardless of fragmentation mode and also resolves the issue with TMT3 identifications.
Would you be open to adding support for filtering by MS level in MS-GF+?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: