We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
BLASBenchmarks
Octavian
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think size ranges of 1:100 and logspace(100, 10_000, N) are good, where N is the number of sampled sizes.
1:100
logspace(100, 10_000, N)
N
I can add benchmarks for Skylake-X, Haswell (probably not all the way up to 10_000, perhaps stopping at just 1_000), and Tiger Lake.
Having example results would be nice for BLASBenchmarks, while Octavian should showcase its performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That sounds good to me!
Sorry, something went wrong.
BTW, what do you think a good value for N would be?
Depends on how patient you are.
Would be cool if we could use Buildkite to auto generate these benchmark plots.
Yeah. Now that actions is reenabled, would be good to get around to setting it up. I've been meaning to upload a few plots to Octavian's README.
No branches or pull requests
I think size ranges of
1:100
andlogspace(100, 10_000, N)
are good, whereN
is the number of sampled sizes.I can add benchmarks for Skylake-X, Haswell (probably not all the way up to 10_000, perhaps stopping at just 1_000), and Tiger Lake.
Having example results would be nice for BLASBenchmarks, while Octavian should showcase its performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: