-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Cone Phantom #57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
A right circular cone is easy and I'd be glad to add that myself so that you can focus on the harder work at MRIReco.jl, unless you want to make the PR yourself. An oblique cone would be harder because we'd need another parameter in its |
No, I don't have analytical methods for the Radon transform and spectrum. But while it is great to have these for certain shapes I would also say that this should not be a show stopper for the introduction of other shapes. |
Is a right circular cone sufficient for you? (Actually it doesn't have to be circular - we'll get ellipses for free, but is right sufficient?) |
yes for my application a right circular cone is sufficient. I would think we don't need to make the shape collection exhaustive but rather collect common shapes used in tomography applications so far. |
Closed by #62 |
Within magnetic particle imaging we are using cone phantoms:
Here is some hacked code that generates a synthetic cone
Would something like this fit into
ImagePhantoms.jl
? Of course a proper version derived from triangle.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: