Skip to content

Update signatures in readme to use AbstractVector #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2025

Conversation

m-fila
Copy link
Member

@m-fila m-fila commented May 16, 2025

The signatures in readme still mention Vector{T} instead of AbstractVector{T}
This is follow up to #150 - we forgot to update readme 😁

This is follow up to #150 - we forgot to update readme 😁
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.07%. Comparing base (0f47837) to head (8089065).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #154   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.07%   75.07%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1252     1252           
=======================================
  Hits          940      940           
  Misses        312      312           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

Thanks @m-fila - this should go onto the PR checklist!

@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart merged commit bfaf2b7 into main May 19, 2025
10 checks passed
@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart deleted the abstract-vector-readme branch May 19, 2025 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants