Skip to content

Work towards atomic legalization #701

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

vchuravy
Copy link
Member

@vchuravy vchuravy commented Jun 17, 2025

Given #652 I was thinking on how we best could test the correct legalization,

For now this adds some tests for the status quo.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 12.00000% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.03%. Comparing base (8b8c73f) to head (c6fbdb5).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/atomic_legalization.jl 0.00% 18 Missing ⚠️
src/driver.jl 42.85% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #701      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.63%   71.03%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files          24       25       +1     
  Lines        3519     3470      -49     
==========================================
- Hits         2521     2465      -56     
- Misses        998     1005       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@maleadt

This comment was marked as outdated.

@vchuravy vchuravy force-pushed the vc/atomic_legalizer branch from 4965f28 to 510d6c7 Compare June 25, 2025 08:53
@vchuravy vchuravy changed the title Add Lit based test for atomic legalization Work towards atomic legalization Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants