Skip to content

Connect jabref export layouts with latex #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
CesMak opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Connect jabref export layouts with latex #3

CesMak opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@CesMak
Copy link

CesMak commented May 17, 2020

Hey there,

I have a lot of articles and books in my jabref and connected it with latex using:

\bibliography{./Literatur/lit}

In the Literatur folder I have 3 files: BibtexFile (lit.bib), lit.bib.bak, lit.bib.sav

Now I want to change my literature file. Currently all authors with all names and last names are included (in capital letters...). I read that I need custom exports, but I cannot export to a BibTex File using those. The main supported export layout format seems to be *.rtf which I cannot read in latex....

Is there any method to use layouts from this repro as export filters for latex?

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented May 20, 2020

No, this is not planned. Do you use bibtex or biblatex? I would recommend biblatex. See https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Bibliographies_with_biblatex_and_biber for details.

Please be aware that bibtex (or biber/biblatex) renders the output for latex, not jabref

grafik

See http://www.suedraum.de/latex/stammtisch/degenkolb_latex_biblatex_folien.pdf

@CesMak
Copy link
Author

CesMak commented May 25, 2020

Thanks for the hints 👍

Issue can be closed.

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented Oct 7, 2020

I leave it open as a reminder to refine the documentation.

This issue also refs https://github.com/koppor/jabref/issues/392

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants