-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
"New entry from plain text" gives strange results #11805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
we are using grobid for New entry from Plaintext https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid |
It's based on machine learning technology. Sometimes there will be confabulations. I recommend to manually cross-check any data obtained this way and make use of "import by ID". If you can find the DOI of an entry, then that's probably best. "New entry from plaintext" can speed up your workflow, but it's imprecise. |
This is solved with #11831? Maybe, we just missed to close this issue (and add a link to this issue in the CHANGELOG.md entry)? |
Let me check quickly |
With LLM parsing everything is all right! I'll close the issue. Moreover, we also added a warning in the plain citations parser window |
JabRef version
5.15 (latest release)
Operating system
Windows
Details on version and operating system
Linux Mint 22 (XFCE)
Checked with the latest development build (copy version output from About dialog)
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
The result is:
While I was expecting something like:
Appendix
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: