doc: add this doc/planning folder so it stops being in my index

Author: KernelDeimos

doc/planning/alternatives-to-$.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+### Problem
+
+When sending metadata along with arbitrary JSON objects,
+a collision of property names may occur. For example, the
+driver system can't place a "type" property on an arbitrary
+response coming from a driver because that might also be
+the name of a property in the response.
+
+
+#### Example:
+```json
+{
+    "type": "api:thing",
+    "version": "v1.0.0",
+    "some": "info"
+}
+```
+
+#### Awful Solution
+
+Reserved words. Drivers need to know their response can't have
+keys like `type` or `version`. If we'd like to add more meta
+keys in the future we need to verify that no existing drivers
+use the new key we'd like to reserve. If we have have such features
+as user-submitted drivers this will be impossibe.
+A `meta` key as a single reserved word could work, which is one
+of the solutions discussed below.
+
+#### Obvious Solution:
+
+The obvious solution is to return an object with a
+`head` property and a `body` propery:
+
+```json
+{
+  "head": {
+    "type": "api:thing",
+    "version": "v1.0.0"
+  },
+  "body": {
+    "some": "info"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+I don't mind this solution. I've come up with some alternatives though,
+because this solution has a couple drawbacks:
+- it looks a little verbose
+- it's not backwards-compatible with arbitrary JSON-object responses
+
+## Solutions
+
+### Dollar-Sign Convention
+
+- Objects have two classes of keys:
+  - "meta" keys begin with "$"
+  - other keys must validate against the
+    usual identifier rules: `/[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*/`
+- The meta key `$` indicates the schema or class of
+  the object.
+- Example:
+  ```json
+  {
+    "$": "api:thing",
+    "$version": "v1.0.0",
+
+    "some": "info"
+  }
+  ```
+- what sucks about it:
+  - `$` might be surprising or confusing
+  - response is a subset of valid JSON keys
+    (those not including `$`)
+- what's nice about it:
+  - backwards-compatible with arbitrary JSON-object responses
+    which don't already use `$`
+
+### Underscore Convention
+- Same as above, but `_` instead of `$`
+  ```json
+  {
+    "_": "api:thing",
+    "_version": "v1.0.0",
+
+    "some": "info"
+  }
+  ```
+- what sucks about it:
+  - `_` might be confusing
+  - response is a subset of valid JSON keys
+    (those not including `_`)
+- what's nice about it:
+  - `_` is conventionally used for private property names,
+    so this might be a little less surprising
+  - backwards-compatible with arbitrary JSON-object responses
+    which don't already use `_`
+
+### Nesting Convention, simplified
+
+- Similar to the "obvious solution" except
+  metadata fields are lifted up a level.
+  It's relatively inconsequential if meta keys
+  have reserved words compared to value keys.
+  ```json
+  {
+    "type": "api:thing",
+    "version": "v1.0.0",
+    "value": {
+        "some": "info"
+    }
+  }
+  ```
+  
+### Modified Dollar/Underscore convention
+- Using `_` in this example, but instead of prefixing
+  meta properties they all go under one key.
+  ```json
+  {
+    "_": {
+        "type": "api:thing",
+        "version": "v1.0.0"
+    },
+
+    "some": "info"
+  }
+  ```
+- what sucks about it:
+  - `_` might be confusing
+  - response is a subset of valid JSON keys
+    (those not **exactly** `_`)
+- what's nice about it:
+  - `_` is conventionally used for private property names,
+    so this might be a little less surprising
+  - backwards-compatible with arbitrary JSON-object responses
+    which don't already use `_` as an exact key
+  - only one reserved key

doc/planning/micro-modules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Micro Modules
+
+**CoreModule** has a large number of services. Each service handles
+a general concern, like "notifications", but increasing this granularity
+a little put more could allow a lot more code re-use.
+
+One specific example that comes to mind is services that provide
+CRUD operations for a database table. The **EntityStoreService** can
+be used for a lot of these even though right now it's specifically
+used for drivers. Having a common class of service like this can also
+allow quickly configuring the equivalent service for providing those
+CRUD operations through an API.