You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Google assets from gstatic.com or googleapis.com do no follow their own audit rules and being flagged in Lighthouse
What is the expected behavior?
As per issue #6140, Google assets do no follow their own audit rules and should be excluded, but gstatic.com & googleapis.com seems not to be included on the excluded assets raised from that GH issues, should they also be excluded too?
As per issue #6140, Google assets do no follow their own audit rules and should be excluded, but gstatic.com & googleapis.com seems not to be included on the excluded assets raised from that GH issues, should they also be excluded too?
Hi @carl-alberto, I think maybe the discussion in #6140 was misconstrued? The decision was not to exclude assets from gstatic from the Lighthouse report, it was to make sure they could be hidden by unchecking the "Show 3rd party resources" checkbox to see things from just the origin being tested. Resources from Google aren't treated any differently than resources from anywhere else for the render-blocking audit.
As for the checkbox, I'm not able to reproduce the behavior you have in your screenshot when I run against that site in DevTools. The checkbox is available and correctly filters out the resources from gstatic and cloudfront if unchecked.
@carl-alberto the checkbox will be disabled when all resources in the table are 3rd party resources, i.e. we don't allow you to filter down to an empty table.
Provide the steps to reproduce
What is the current behavior?
Google assets from gstatic.com or googleapis.com do no follow their own audit rules and being flagged in Lighthouse
What is the expected behavior?
As per issue #6140, Google assets do no follow their own audit rules and should be excluded, but gstatic.com & googleapis.com seems not to be included on the excluded assets raised from that GH issues, should they also be excluded too?
Environment Information
Related issues
#6140
Possibly also related:
#4516
#9256
#8955
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: