-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
[ AGNTLOG-56 ] - Shift pkg/logs over to the new implementation of the auditor #36259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: ed16749
|
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=63120786 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit e3bf1aa |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: ed16749 ❌ Experiments with missing or malformed dataThis is a critical error. No usable optimization goal data was produced by the listed experiments. This may be a result of misconfiguration. Ping #single-machine-performance and we can help out. Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +2.26 | [-1.53, +6.06] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +1.09 | [+1.03, +1.15] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.65 | [+0.59, +0.70] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.65 | [+0.49, +0.80] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.37 | [+0.21, +0.52] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.10 | [-0.78, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.85, +0.96] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.84, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.03 | [-0.09, +0.15] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.84, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.83, +0.85] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.82, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.27, +0.28] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.02, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -0.00 | [-0.05, +0.05] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.22, +0.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.02 | [-0.17, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.88, +0.83] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.09 | [-1.00, +0.82] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.19 | [-0.28, -0.09] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.34, -0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.53 | [-0.60, -0.47] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.93 | [-3.67, +1.80] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
f13b6ac
to
e44ca43
Compare
19ee9b5
to
d8820e9
Compare
d8820e9
to
e3bf1aa
Compare
/merge |
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The expected merge time in
|
What does this PR do?
Shift the references to pkg/logs/auditor over to comp/logs/auditor implementation. These implementations are identical, and this change should be an effective no-op.
Additionally replace the auditor interface in pkg/logs/sender with a leaner "Sink" interface. Equally non-functional of a change, this alteration will allow for usage of the logs agent pipeline by otel without requiring the export of new auditor go modules.
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Changes were validated by automated testing
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes
Full MR list for auditor migration:
#36259
#36292
#36295
#36348