Skip to content

[BGP] Static routes require Ack to be send from fpmsyncd #1579

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

stepanblyschak
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed wrong statement, static routes do require Ack to be advertised.

prsunny
prsunny previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2024
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ High level requirements:
Restrictions/Limitations:

- MPLS, VNET routes are out of scope of this document
- Directly connected and static routes are announced by BGP regardless of their offload status
- Directly connected are announced by BGP regardless of their offload status
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Directed connected routes?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@venkatmahalingam

C>* 100.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet160, 00:33:18

Copy link
Collaborator

@venkatmahalingam venkatmahalingam Jan 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I meant the below highlighted update.
Directly connected routes are announced by BGP regardless of their offload status

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, thanks for catching this!

@prsunny prsunny merged commit 657f068 into sonic-net:master Jan 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants