Gcov for swss daemon #1737
Merged
Gcov for swss daemon #1737
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
…ragilenetworks/sonic-swss into gcov_for_swss_daemon
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pettershao-ragilenetworks <[email protected]>
xumia
reviewed
Oct 8, 2021
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 1737 in repo Azure/sonic-swss |
|
@prsunny help forward，have rebuild done! |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
hi @prsunny @theasianpianist help forward this, thanks! |
|
/Azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
prsunny
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2021
|
@xumia , could you please sign-off ? |
xumia
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2021
kcudnik
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2021
|
@pettershao-ragilenetworks hey, can we try use this approach on sonic-sairedis repo ? to find out what coverage could be achieved, since current unittest cover on sairedis repo in 60%, i will write mail |
OK! |
EdenGri
pushed a commit
to EdenGri/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2022
Signed-off-by: bingwang <[email protected]>
oleksandrivantsiv
pushed a commit
to oleksandrivantsiv/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2023
include changes: 0031470 | improve enum values integration check (sonic-net#1727) (sonic-net#1737) Signed-off-by: richardyu-ms <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
Introduce gcov-related automation script to test coverage rate for swss module
relate HLD: sonic-net/SONiC#642
Why I did it
Attempt to integrate coverage report for each module in SONiC to Azure pipeline
How I verified it
Using Azure pipeline to check whether a coverage report can be checked after a pull request
Details if related