Skip to content

Add support for swig 4.0 in configure.ac #511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kcudnik
Copy link
Contributor

@kcudnik kcudnik commented Jul 25, 2021

No description provided.

@kcudnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

kcudnik commented Jul 25, 2021

test error on test_ConfigDBSubscribe not related to PR

@kcudnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

kcudnik commented Jul 25, 2021

@arlakshm can you check this test_ConfigDBSubscribe ?

@qiluo-msft
Copy link
Contributor

I am working on fixing the test_ConfigDBSubscribe.

configure.ac Outdated
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ esac],[debug=false])
AM_CONDITIONAL(DEBUG, test x$debug = xtrue)
AM_CONDITIONAL(ARCH64, test `getconf LONG_BIT` = "64")

AC_PATH_PROG(SWIG, [swig3.0])
AC_PATH_PROGS(SWIG, [swig3.0 swig])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is swig only for version 4.0? If it is a general one, do we still need swig3.0 ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not exactly sure, but latest 4.0 binary is "swig" but 3.0 is "swig3.0", this macro will check for both in this order

@kcudnik kcudnik closed this Sep 2, 2021
@kcudnik kcudnik deleted the swig4 branch September 2, 2021 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants