-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
🐛 Fix preflight check for generic provider overlap with core #855
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Fix preflight check for generic provider overlap with core #855
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-operator ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
9a61073
to
b99eb40
Compare
Signed-off-by: Danil-Grigorev <[email protected]>
b99eb40
to
7399ae7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alexander-demicev The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 7448d2c7e24225b8d797e0a5c011e487638b552c
|
What this PR does / why we need it:
In a scenario when a homogeneous provider type is used, core provider preflight check reports a false negative failure, due to encountering more than one core provider in the list.
To fix this, we need to compare provider type for both current and found at all times.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #