You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, truncation of input fields is automatically enabled when a path to the truncation matrices is provided. While this implicit control may be convenient in some cases, it reduces clarity and flexibility, especially for users who might provide all hardware configurations in configuration files in their home or want more explicit control over input processing.
Describe the solution you'd like
Introduce a dedicated flag in a configuration file (e.g., apply_truncation: true/false) to explicitly control whether truncation of input fields is applied.
This would decouple truncation behaviour from the presence of a truncation matrix path, making the configuration more predictable and aligned with how other features are toggled.
This change would improve transparency and user control in the configuration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Organisation
ECMWF
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, truncation of input fields is automatically enabled when a path to the truncation matrices is provided. While this implicit control may be convenient in some cases, it reduces clarity and flexibility, especially for users who might provide all hardware configurations in configuration files in their home or want more explicit control over input processing.
Describe the solution you'd like
Introduce a dedicated flag in a configuration file (e.g., apply_truncation: true/false) to explicitly control whether truncation of input fields is applied.
This would decouple truncation behaviour from the presence of a truncation matrix path, making the configuration more predictable and aligned with how other features are toggled.
This change would improve transparency and user control in the configuration.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Organisation
ECMWF
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: